|
○
|
Despite 117 letters and 600 petitioners objecting, SSDC pressed ahead with their own planning application
|
|
○
|
The Town Council recommend refusal in accordance with planning rules
|
|
○
|
Local residents were given less than 10 weeks to object
|
|
○
|
No public consultation about the location of building
|
|
○
|
Public wanted cafe and toilets at playground 400 metres away
|
|
○
|
One quarter of the building has light industrial usage
|
|
○
|
SSDC claimed this was a small building but it will cost £353,000
|
|
○
|
A beautiful Maple tree and Silver Birches to be felled
|
|
○
|
Hedges removed screening car park
|
|
○
|
The flat landscape to be scarred by 250m2 footprint of this building 18 feet high
|
|
○
|
Diverse groups of people who use the land will lose out
|
|
○
|
Alternative sites for Rangers Building discounted
|
|
○
|
The future of this lost land is tied to Goldenstones money-
|
|
○
|
Tax payers money used to finance planning development without adequate public consultation
|
|
○
|
Key SSDC staff not kept up to date with local changes to mains services
|
|
○
|
Building only 10 metres from curtilage of private residential property
|
|
○
|
Formerly a quiet location, this will now allow parties of up to 79 people.
|
|
○
|
Noise will emanate from a heat pump as well as public and vehicular usage
|
|
○
|
Important documents omitted from SSDC web site affecting planning decision-
|
|
○
|
Heritage grant denies Yeovilians of their park heritage
|
|
○
|
In 1988, SSDC promised never to build in the open space here once Goldenstones plans were approved
|